Justice for the Ram, part III

Dato Ramli Yusuff has consistently maintained that he did nothing wrong. Yet, government officials protecting their political masters' interests and now allowed themselves and their good offices to be lackeys and running dogs for the corrupt establishments.

So corrupt lackeys for the Umno corrupt regime like AG and IGP trump up charges against Ramli, despite there was nothing to begin with but smear his good name in mud.

The courts convened and they let him go.

Two courts uphold Ramli Yusof acquittals

Posted on 25 November 2011 - 06:34pm
Last updated on 26 November 2011 - 09:54amPrintKUALA LUMPUR (Nov 25 2011) : The High Court here today upheld the acquittal of Bukit Aman Commercial Crimes Investigation Department former director Datuk Ramli Yusuff charged with the failure to declare ownership of company shares and interest in two properties.
Judge Datuk Ghazali Cha rejected the prosecution's appeal against a Sessions Court decision to acquit Ramli without having to enter his defence, on March 12 2010.
In his judgment, Ghazali said the decision by Judge M.Gunalan was accurate and contained no errors.
Furthermore, he said the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against the respondent in the first three charges.
Ghazali said it was proven in the first count that Ramli did not have an interest in the two office buildings owned by Bonus Circle Sdn Bhd, a company in which his siblings were directors.
He added that Ramli was not a director of the company and did not hold any of its shares.
As for the second count of failing to declare 154,000 shares in Permaju Industries Berhad, the judge said it was clear that Ramli had no knowledge of the shares and its related documents.
In relation to the third count which involved Telekom shares, Ramli was not a shareholder at the time he was charged said Ghazali.
Ramli was charged with failing to declare his interest in the RM1.03 million office buildings and ownership of 154,000 and 20,000 shares in Permaju Industries and Telekom Malaysia Berhad respectively.
Ramli was represented by Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah while DPP Mohd Sophian Zakaria prosecuted.
In a separate High Court, Judge Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah also upheld Ramli's acquittal of a charge of holding a post in an agriculture company while still in public service, five years ago.
Mohamad Zabidin said Ramli did not commit any offence in the said case.
On Aug 20, Sessions Court Judge S.M. Komathy Suppiah had acquitted Ramli when the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against him.
Ramli was charged with being a director in Kinsajaya Sdn Bhd while still holding the post of director in the Bukit Aman department, on May 2 2006. -- Bernama